Describe Section 117 Of BSA

Lead India

3 days ago6 min read

Section 117 Of Bsa: Presumption As To Abetment Of Suicide By A Married Woman

In India, Crimes Against Married Women, Particularly Related To Domestic Violence And Dowry Harassment, Have Been An Ongoing Concern. The Indian Legal System, Recognizing These Issues, Has Put Forth Several Punitive Provisions To Address Crimes Against Women, With A Particular Focus On Protecting Their Rights In Marital Relationships. One Of The Significant Legal Provisions Is Section 117 Of The Bsa, Which Deals With The Presumption Of Abetment Of Suicide In Cases Involving Married Women Who Have Been Subjected To Cruelty Or Harassment. This Section Allows The Court To Presume That The Suicide Of A Married Woman Was Abetted By Her Husband Or Any Of His Family Members If Specific Criteria Are Met.

Section 117 Of The Bsa, Previously Section 113a Of The Indian Evidence Act, Serves A Crucial Role In Ensuring Justice In Cases Where A Married Woman Takes Her Own Life Due To The Mental And Physical Abuse Inflicted By Her Husband Or His Family. This Article Delves Deeper Into The Provisions Of Section 117 Of The Bsa, Its Application, And Its Broader Implications.

What Is Section 117 Of Bsa?

Section 117 Of The Bsa (Formerly Section 113a Of The Indian Evidence Act) Presumes That A Married Woman's Suicide May Have Been Abetted By Her Husband Or His Relatives If It Can Be Proven That:

The Suicide Occurred Within Seven Years Of The Woman’s Marriage.
The Woman Had Been Subjected To Cruelty Or Harassment By Her Husband Or His Family Members.

The Presumption Established By This Section Allows The Court To Consider These Two Factors (Suicide Within Seven Years Of Marriage And Cruelty Or Harassment) And Determine If The Husband Or His Relatives Played A Role In Encouraging The Woman's Decision To Take Her Own Life.

Key Elements Of Section 117 Of Bsa

Presumption Of Abetment: Section 117 Creates A Legal Presumption That A Married Woman’s Suicide, Committed Within Seven Years Of Marriage, Is The Result Of Abetment By Her Husband Or Any Of His Family Members, Provided There Is Evidence Of Cruelty Or Mistreatment. This Presumption Is Not Absolute, And The Court Must Consider All Other Facts And Circumstances Of The Case.
Cruelty Or Harassment: To Invoke Section 117, The Woman Must Have Been Subjected To Cruelty Or Harassment By Her Husband Or His Family. This Can Include Physical Violence, Emotional Abuse, Or Other Forms Of Mistreatment That May Contribute To The Woman’s Mental And Emotional Distress, Leading To Suicide.
Seven-Year Period: The Law Applies Only If The Woman Commits Suicide Within Seven Years Of Her Marriage. This Period Is Considered To Be A Reasonable Time Frame During Which A Woman Might Be Subjected To Mistreatment That Could Lead To Such A Tragic Outcome.

Presumption Of Fact Under Section 117

A Presumption Of Fact Is A Legal Assumption Made By The Court, Based On Evidence That Suggests The Likelihood Of A Particular Fact. In The Case Of Section 117 Of The Bsa, The Presumption Is That The Husband Or His Relatives Were Involved In The Abetment Of The Suicide. This Presumption Is Based On The Woman’s Suicide Happening Within Seven Years Of Marriage And Evidence Of Cruelty.

However, This Presumption Is Not Definitive. The Accused Can Present Evidence To Counter This Assumption, And The Court Will Evaluate All The Facts Before Making A Final Decision. The Purpose Of This Presumption Is To Shift The Burden Of Proof To The Accused. If The Accused Cannot Refute The Presumption Or Provide Credible Evidence, The Court May Conclude That The Abetment Of Suicide Has Occurred.

Scope Of Section 117

Section 117 Of The Bsa Applies In Cases Where:

The Suicide Is Committed By A Married Woman.
The Suicide Happens Within Seven Years Of Marriage.
There Is Evidence Of Mistreatment Or Cruelty Inflicted By The Husband Or His Family Members.

This Section Is Intended To Address The Issue Of Dowry-Related Harassment, Domestic Violence, And Other Forms Of Abuse That Might Lead A Woman To Take Her Own Life. The Presumption Under This Section Helps To Address Cases Where The Victim Cannot Testify Due To Death, And The Evidence May Not Be Sufficient To Prove Direct Involvement Of The Accused.

Legal Procedure And Burden Of Proof

When A Case Involving Section 117 Is Brought Before The Court, The Burden Of Proof Is Initially Shifted To The Accused. In Simpler Terms, Once The Basic Criteria Are Proven — The Suicide Occurring Within Seven Years Of Marriage And The Evidence Of Cruelty — The Court May Presume That The Husband Or His Relatives Abetted The Suicide. It Becomes The Responsibility Of The Accused To Present Evidence Proving Their Innocence Or Disputing The Claim.

However, The Burden Of Persuasion Remains With The Prosecution. This Means That, Even Though The Presumption May Shift The Burden Of Proof, The Court Will Require The Prosecution To Prove That The Suicide Was Indeed Abetted By The Husband Or His Family. If The Prosecution Can Demonstrate That The Presumption Holds, The Accused May Be Found Guilty Unless They Can Present Convincing Evidence To The Contrary.

Effects Of The Presumption

Impact On The Defendant (Husband Or Family Members): The Presumption In Section 117 Has Significant Consequences For The Accused. If The Court Is Satisfied That The Suicide Occurred Within Seven Years Of Marriage And That The Woman Was Subjected To Cruelty, It May Presume The Involvement Of The Husband Or His Relatives. In Such Cases, The Onus Is On The Accused To Prove That The Suicide Was Not Abetted.
Role Of Evidence: While The Presumption Shifts The Burden Of Proof, It Does Not Automatically Result In A Conviction. If The Accused Can Present Counter-Evidence Or Raise Doubts Regarding The Presumption, The Court Will Carefully Evaluate All Evidence Before Deciding On The Outcome.
Retrospective Application: Section 117 Of The Bsa Is Retrospective In Nature. This Means That The Provision Applies To Cases Of Abetment Of Suicide That Occurred Before The Section Was Introduced Into The Law. Thus, Even If The Offense Occurred Prior To The Enactment Of Section 117, The Presumption Still Applies If The Criteria Are Met.

The Importance Of Section 117 In Protecting Women

Section 117 Of The Bsa Is Crucial In Addressing Issues Related To Domestic Violence And Dowry Harassment. By Creating A Presumption That A Woman's Suicide Within Seven Years Of Marriage, Following Cruelty By Her Husband Or His Relatives, Was Abetted, The Law Acts As A Deterrent Against Such Abuses. It Shifts The Responsibility Onto The Accused To Prove Their Innocence, Thereby Strengthening The Legal Framework For Protecting Women's Rights.

This Section Is Part Of A Broader Effort By The Indian Legal System To Curb Crimes Against Women And Provide Justice To Victims Of Domestic Violence. The Presumption Provided Under Section 117 Helps Ensure That Perpetrators Of Abuse Cannot Escape Accountability Simply By Relying On The Victim’s Inability To Testify.

Faqs On Section 117 Of Bsa

Q1: What Is Section 117 Of The Bsa?

Section 117 Of The Bsa (Formerly Section 113a Of The Indian Evidence Act) Presumes That A Married Woman’s Suicide, If It Occurs Within Seven Years Of Marriage, Is A Result Of Abetment By Her Husband Or His Relatives If There Is Evidence Of Cruelty Or Mistreatment.

Q2: How Does The Presumption Work In A Case Involving Section 117?

If A Woman Commits Suicide Within Seven Years Of Her Marriage, And There Is Evidence Of Cruelty By Her Husband Or His Relatives, The Court May Presume That The Suicide Was Abetted By Them. The Burden Of Proof Is Then Shifted To The Accused To Refute This Presumption.

Q3: What Evidence Is Required To Invoke Section 117?

The Court Will Require Evidence Of Cruelty Or Harassment By The Husband Or His Relatives, As Well As The Fact That The Suicide Occurred Within Seven Years Of Marriage.

Q4: Can The Accused Rebut The Presumption In Section 117?

Yes, The Accused Can Present Evidence To Refute The Presumption. The Burden Of Proof Shifts To Them, But They Can Counter The Presumption With Relevant Evidence To Prove That The Suicide Was Not Abetted.

Q5: Does Section 117 Apply Retroactively?

Yes, Section 117 Applies To Offenses Committed Before The Provision Was Enacted, As It Is Retrospective In Nature.

Q6: What Happens If The Presumption Is Not Rebutted?

If The Presumption Of Abetment Is Not Rebutted By The Accused, The Court May Convict The Husband Or His Family Members Based On The Available Evidence.

Conclusion

Section 117 Of The Bsa Plays A Critical Role In Addressing The Tragic Issue Of Suicides Among Married Women In India, Particularly Those Resulting From Domestic Cruelty And Dowry Harassment. By Allowing Courts To Presume Abetment Of Suicide By The Husband Or His Family Members, This Provision Shifts The Burden Of Proof To The Accused, Ensuring That Perpetrators Are Held Accountable For Their Actions. This Legal Framework Provides An Important Tool In The Ongoing Fight For Women's Rights And Justice In India.

One Can Talk To Lawyers From Lead India For Any Kind Of Legal Support. In India, Free Legal Advice Online Can Be Obtained At Lead India. Along With Receiving Free Legal Advice Online, One Can Also Ask Questions To The Experts Online Free Through Lead India.